Wednesday 29 February 2012

Bracknell Blog review




An excerpt from a nice little review I found on the Bracknell Blog, which is unsurprisingly a blog for Bracknell and its surrounding areas. The last part to me seems quite relevant and supportive of the issues we are addressing in this brief, which is cool. The comments were also mostly quite favourable (particularly the first one):





Here is a link to the post:

http://bracknellblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/i-newspaper-review.html


Circulation figures Jan '12


Some figures for newspaper circulation in January this year. From:

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48735&c=1

Dailies
  • Daily Mirror : 1,122,563 ; -5.99 ( 2.78 )
  • Daily Record : 276,003 ; -10.06 ( 0.55 )
  • Daily Star : 624,029 ; -15.02 ( 1.22 )
  • The Sun : 2,751,219 ; -8.35 ( 8.71 )
  • Daily Express : 586,707 ; -8.31 ( -1.63 )
  • Daily Mail : 2,011,283 ; -5.86 ( 0.82 )
  • The Daily Telegraph : 596,180 ; -8.45 ( 1.56 )
  • Financial Times : 319,757 ; -16.53 ( -4.20 )
  • The Herald : 46,479 ; -10.80 ( 0.24 )
  • The Guardian : 229,753 ; -17.74 ( -0.15 )
  • i : 243,321 ; 82.30 ( 9.74 )
  • The Independent : 117,084 ; -36.72 ( -2.06 )
  • The Scotsman : 39,331 ; -9.30 ( 1.77 )
  • The Times : 405,113 ; -11.40 ( -0.96 )
  • Racing Post : 47,741 ; -5.02 ( -4.60 )
Sundays
  • Daily Star Sunday : 644,804 ; 103.59 ( 0.69 )
  • Sunday Mail : 370,355 ; 1.10 ( 1.40 )
  • Sunday Mirror : 1,753,202 ; 60.43 ( 3.01 )
  • The People : 770,772 ; 53.89 ( -1.22 )
  • Sunday Express : 607,894 ; 10.47 ( -3.02 )
  • Sunday Post : 302,388 ; -4.88 ( 0.18 )
  • The Mail on Sunday : 1,921,010 ; -1.89 ( 0.63 )
  • Independent on Sunday : 124,428 ; -18.44 ( -3.09 )
  • The Observer : 264,321 ; -15.87 ( -0.88 )
  • Scotland on Sunday : 50,726 ; -9.83 ( 11.11 )
  • Sunday Herald : 31,106 ; -27.80 ( 7.95 )
  • The Sunday Telegraph : 461,772 ; -6.92 ( 1.97 )
  • The Sunday Times : 967,975 ; -6.87 ( 3.48 )

Marketing Week article


Article taken from Marketing Week, written by Lara O'Reilly.
http://www.marketingweek.co.uk/i-newspaper-has-reason-to-celebrate-on-its-first-anniversary/3031304.article
The article's only a few months old, hopefully making it still relevant and a worthwhile read. I think the article pretty effectively outlines how the i has been succeeding in the past year of its existence, something that is quite reassuring when it comes to this brief.



As the i newspaper slices into its first birthday cake today, its doubters may well be eating humble pie as they look back on its overwhelmingly successful year in one of the toughest ever periods for print media.
The 20p i was launched last October by the marketing, sales and editorial teams at the Independent to meet the demand of time-poor consumers who wanted to read a quality daily at a fraction of the size and cost.
Andrew Mullins, managing director of i, gave Marketing Week a food-based analogy for the reasoning behind the launch last year: “Quality newspapers have been in decline for quite a while, and it’s coming down to a core bunch of readers who read a very large paper every day. It’s like a three-course meal: how often do you want to eat a three-course meal? That’s fine if you’re at home seven days a week, but commuters on the move prefer to snack. And i is a snacking news product.”
And that bite-size product is a “healthy alternative” to the tabloid flavour crisps the paper’s audience were (and for some, perhaps still are) pigging out on. And according to the i’s latest ABC figure, more than 184,000 people are now indulging in - arguably - more wholesome newspaper diets, while still paying mere pennies for the product.
The combined circulations of the Independent and the i overtook the Guardian in February, with the publisher now offering a joint circulation of more than 350,000, compared to the Guardian’s 232,566, according to September ABC figures.
I’s climbing circulation and the fact that it now apparently turns a profit - although the Independent does not reveal figures - led to a 30p Saturday edition, which was launched in May.
The i also does not seem to have dramatically cannabalised sales of the Independent. Although the older title’s circulation is slipping, Mullins says more people are reading paid-for Independent content than ever before.
Consumer interest around the i has been matched by advertisers, who can place ads across both Independent papers - and also the Evening Standard - to ensure maximum reach to an upmarket audience. Media buyers have been “universally positive” in their feedback on the new paper, according to Mullins.
In the year ahead, a new TV ad campaign featuring celebrities - much like its first ads starring Dom Joly and Jemima Khan - is planned as the newspaper looks to continue its circulation uplift and boost advertising revenue.
Mullins told Marketing Week earlier this year that in launching a new paper, the Independent’s marketing budget needs to work “four to five times” harder than usual, which is why ad campaigns have been “selective” to date.
In the year ahead, the i will continue to build momentum slowly as its publisher looks for new relevant audiences and innovative ad deals, but now it has the added bonus of a year’s worth of data to consult when approaching new territories.
The i has proved even in its infancy that there is still space for new entrants in the crowded daily newspaper market. Perhaps other media owners could use the model as inspiration to fill a News of the World shaped gap on Sunday.

Tuesday 28 February 2012

a couple of opinions



A screen shot taken from a site giving a quick review of the new daily paper; this highlights some of the main approval/concerns. Some obviously welcome the idea of a cheap, daily, concise paper, though others are quick to highlight potential downfalls, most of which are very valid points. 

Perhaps the most valid factor that would dissuade potential buyers is that they are more likely to watch television or go online - in my own situation, I can keep fairly well updated through digital media, for example the Guardian app on facebook - I reckon this will apply for many other students also, and so this would potentially be one of the biggest problems to tackle. 

The approval seems to quite heavily outweigh the potential cons however; having purchased the paper a number of times myself, I feel that it is well worth the twenty pence found on my desk every now and again, and this should become its major selling point; it sits bang in the middle of everything else, a good all-rounder with no particular bias, not filled with rubbish like various other daily papers. 

I think it is crucial to begin exploring the paper's current problems in terms of its very generic nature and try and work out some solutions in terms of making it appeal to students.

Monday 27 February 2012

Think Quarterly




Every now and again I need a bit of a reminder of what I love in the world of graphic design; and I think it's stuff like this. Designing for editorial/publishing; that kind of thing, you know. I'm enjoying this magazine at the moment, not sure where you'd buy a physical copy but the digital version is fine for me at the moment, the whole thing's full of nifty little ideas, nice layouts and a good use of image. The kind of thing (in my opinion) other magazines should aspire to be like. Makes for quite an interesting read as well.

Friday 17 February 2012

JG posters...











































A few nice posters I came across recently...nothing overly special..the first two with regards to layout and the third is just pretty quirky.